For the purposes of this article, I looked at which private choices concerning family life are supported and which are negated in the public discourse on family policy. The lack of a publicly published report summarizing the changes in family policy in recent years has contributed to the use of reports written by the opposing ruling camps in 2015 and 2017. Especially in the case of the Law and Justice report, the discourse on choice is based on the responsibility of parents to meet the needs of their children with little interference from the state. This is in line with the idea of familialism, which puts the family at the center of interest of politics as an entity entitled to various types of services, and supports the caring functions of the family/woman at the expense of formalized and institutional care.